You not only made a ludicrous attempt to supposedly shame me by googling previous stuff about me, but your attempt to do so is as much of a failure as everything else you've posted -- it took me a min to figure out what the hell you were even referring to in regards to "transitive preferences". You are referring to an Ornery forum discussion where someone else asked that question, and I answered them -- not a question I asked others.

Your reading comprehension fails, your google-fu fails, etc, etc...

You also don't seemingly see a discrepancy between your constant accusations of me supposedly being "dishonest" and yet how I openly admit my levels of ignorance whenever such ignorance may be relevant to a discussion?

Nor do you seemingly see a problem with so easily accusing me of such a serious moral crime as dishonesty, without the slightest shred of evidence. Is this what your moral sense entails, freely making slanderous accusations?