nyan_sandwich comments on Morality is Awesome - Less Wrong

86 [deleted] 06 January 2013 03:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (437)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 January 2013 06:14:05AM 1 point [-]

I don't think that would work. People here tend to be more consequentialist than I've seen from people not from here, so we'd probably not be able to see as much of a difference. Plus, the people here are hardly what I'd call normal and are more homogeneous than a more standard set of people. To effectively test that, we'd have to conduct that survey with a more random group of people. I mean, that survey would work, but the sample should be different than the contributors of LessWrong.

If the number of deontologists isn't big enough to power our inference, the stats should tell us this. There are some though.

And I think going outside LW is unnecessary. This essay is hardly aimed at people-in-general.

Comment author: deathpigeon 27 January 2013 06:57:00AM 0 points [-]

If the number of deontologists isn't big enough to power our inference, the stats should tell us this. There are some though.

That's true. Perhaps we could sort them by what their results with "good" show us about which normative ethical theory they follow, then compare the results of each of the groupings between "good" and "awesome". That would show us the results without consequentialists acting as white noise.

And I think going outside LW is unnecessary. This essay is hardly aimed at people-in-general.

Good point, though it would be interesting to see if it could be applied to people outside of LW.