timtyler comments on Homogeneity vs. heterogeneity (or, What kind of sex is most moral?) - Less Wrong

-8 Post author: PhilGoetz 22 May 2009 11:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 25 May 2009 06:23:08PM 0 points [-]

Phil claimed that genetic fitness mattered for ethics - which it probably does. For example, the Shakers believed that everyone should be celibate - and now there aren't any of them around any more.

Comment author: Alicorn 25 May 2009 06:28:52PM 2 points [-]

There would still be Shakers around if they had been able to keep up the practice of adopting children indefinitely. According to Wikipedia, that only stopped working when adoption became the province of the state. Wikipedia also says that there are still four Shakers today and people may join them if they like.