DaFranker comments on Banish the Clippy-creating Bias Demon! - Less Wrong

12 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 18 January 2013 02:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DaFranker 18 January 2013 05:49:18PM *  11 points [-]

I thought of them too, but they've got their filthy money-laundering hands in too many pockets and they're controlling too many people - it would be a losing battle. The triads would be a more realistic target.

Besides, they literally take our people hostage, wear ablative carbon-composite / high-tech-metal-alloy armor, and lug around gallons of flamethrower fuel. They also tend to hunt in packs¹ and establish war camps on our bridges every morning.

We'll need a lot more than one good politician and a few bribes to the media to win that war.²


  1. Most deaths involve multiple of them, IIRC.

  2. But please, if you can, I strongly encourage anyone to prove me wrong. The implication here is that lots of science and engineering and money is needed to fix the dangers and reduce the risks. The kind of science and engineering and money that Google already started doing a while ago.

Comment author: shminux 18 January 2013 06:34:37PM *  7 points [-]

Well, there is a movement afoot to tame their wild nature. Some day being trampled or squished into pulp by these creatures will be but a distant memory, as their descendants follow the path of domestication well traveled by other animals, the past perils replayed only in the highly scripted spectacle of corrida de coches.

Comment author: Desrtopa 19 January 2013 05:11:56AM 2 points [-]

What's probably going to be really difficult is not getting automated cars on the market, but getting all the non-automated cars off the road. An entirely automated traffic flow would be much safer than a partly automated traffic flow, but there are going to be lots of holdouts who refuse to trust an automated car over their own driving ability, or who simply can't or won't buy an up-to-date car.

Comment author: shminux 19 January 2013 07:27:45PM *  2 points [-]

All good points, I addressed some of them in my previous comment on self-driving cars.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 22 January 2013 11:51:54AM 0 points [-]

When automated cars are at 90% or so, and if you keep on getting statistics like how many accidents and deaths are caused by humans versus machines, I think the pressure to go all automated will be strong. Some municipalities and states will go for it, and then it'll be hard to get anywhere with a human-driven car.

Comment author: Desrtopa 22 January 2013 02:09:02PM 1 point [-]

I suspect getting the prevalence as high as 90% will be pretty difficult itself.