John_Maxwell_IV comments on [Link] How Signaling Ossifies Behavior - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 21 January 2013 02:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 28 January 2013 10:16:13AM 0 points [-]

References?

These weren't what I had in mind originally, but they look reasonably good:

Comment author: V_V 28 January 2013 05:31:33PM *  0 points [-]

Indeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Income

Some researchers claim "in economic terms it appears that the IQ score measures something with decreasing marginal value. It is important to have enough of it, but having lots and lots does not buy you that much."[75][76]

Other studies show that ability and performance for jobs are linearly related, such that at all IQ levels, an increase in IQ translates into a concomitant increase in performance.[77] Charles Murray, coauthor of The Bell Curve, found that IQ has a substantial effect on income independently of family background.[78]

Low IQ precludes you various job opportunities, while the correlation between high IQ and performace is more dubious, some studies show decreasing marginal value, other studies show linear correlation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Real-life_accomplishments

This means that certain groups of professionally successful people have higher than average IQ, not that many higher than average IQ people become more professionally successful than average people.