mwengler comments on Official LW uncensored thread (on Reddit) - Less Wrong

60 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 February 2013 08:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: mwengler 05 February 2013 09:14:35PM 0 points [-]

Why not just have a hard-to-find switch that lets you turn off censoring? Maybe you have to have over 500 karma, or you have to renew your turn off every week or somesuch.

This seems to me o be a less clunky solution than publicly advertising an uncensored thread at a different location.

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 February 2013 09:21:53PM 23 points [-]

A few blogs adopt a model like this, e.g. a "cutting-room floor" thread or whatever. Having it offsite on a reasonably stable site is functionally similar and avoids feeling like one is polluting one's own server with stuff that repulses one.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 06 February 2013 04:37:42AM 0 points [-]

Having it offsite on a reasonably stable site is functionally similar and avoids feeling like one is polluting one's own server with stuff that repulses one.

So now we're valuing purity in Haidt's sense?

Comment author: David_Gerard 06 February 2013 08:16:05AM *  1 point [-]

I was trying to describe how I thought EY felt, and I seem to have been correct. It does strike me as an OK solution - imperfect in many ways, but a large improvement on nothing.

The thread might need renewing from time to time, as I think Reddit threads close after a time. (Can't find a FAQ though.)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 February 2013 09:24:37PM 11 points [-]

Well put - this describes my feeling precisely.

Comment author: David_Gerard 06 February 2013 01:08:08AM 15 points [-]

This is quite an elegant solution to the whole mess. Good one.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 06 February 2013 02:01:12AM 11 points [-]

I am very glad to hear you say that. Thank you!

Comment author: shminux 05 February 2013 09:25:38PM *  17 points [-]

This seems to me o be a less clunky solution

Note that the OP solution requires zero development.

EDIT: assembling and posting some ground rules for the site would be another useful zero-development task

Comment author: Jack 05 February 2013 09:24:39PM *  10 points [-]

It might be clunky but it doesn't require rewriting the site code.