Jandila comments on A brief history of ethically concerned scientists - Less Wrong

68 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 09 February 2013 05:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 February 2013 02:29:40AM 5 points [-]

For that matter, if we didn't use the atom bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then we would have gone ahead with the land invasion, resulting in far more fatalities.

This is commonly taught in US schools, but you should be aware that the claim has some serious flaws: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#Militarily_unnecessary

Comment author: Desrtopa 11 February 2013 05:18:18AM 4 points [-]

Gwern already linked to the same page previously. I've updated on the information, however, in my time at school I also did a research project on the atom bombing, and the sources I read for the project (which are not online, at least as far as I know,) cited Japanese military officials who were of the opinion that their country would have continued to resist, even to the point of a land invasion, and that the bombings were instrumental in changing that.

There are certainly good reasons to suspect that Japan might have surrendered soon under the same terms even without the dropping of the bombs, but it's also not as if there is a dearth of evidence suggesting that the bombings were a significant factor.