peter_hurford comments on Pay charities for results? - Less Wrong

1 Post author: BenGilbert 08 February 2013 03:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: peter_hurford 09 February 2013 01:43:43AM 0 points [-]

Ideally, you would pay for the final outcomes which you care about, eg paying a certain amount per unit reduction in child mortality, reduced disease prevalence, improved test scores, etc. If this is too difficult, then you could pay for intermediate results, eg number of children vaccinated, number of people protected by bednets, etc.

A concern, as I see it, is the first part (paying for outcomes) is too difficult to successfully do on a large scale (though social impact bonds do seem promising from my first glances), and the second part (paying for outputs, like number of bed nets) already happens.