fubarobfusco comments on Why AI may not foom - Less Wrong

23 Post author: John_Maxwell_IV 24 March 2013 08:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 25 March 2013 06:00:19PM *  1 point [-]

Neither parallel programming nor quantum computing is going to save the day without massive unprecedented breakthroughs. It's a hard ware problem, and we won't know how hard until we solve it.

We don't use parallel systems efficiently today because we don't have software systems that provide typical programmers with a human-comprehensible interface to program them. Writing efficient, correct parallel code in traditional programming languages is very difficult; and some of the research languages which promise automatic parallelization are on the high end of difficulty for humans to learn.

Comment author: voi6 26 March 2013 07:34:10PM 0 points [-]

Sorry the way worded it makes me look silly. I just meant that even if we had the perfect software we simply wouldn't get a big enough speedup to bridge the gap.