V_V comments on [LINK] Open Source Software Developer with Terminal Illness Hopes to Opt Out of Death - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (18)
This claim is factually false. Cyronics organizations don't use their customers' bodies for research, and in general they don't do much research of any kind.
As far as I know, in over 50 years of existence, cryonics didn't develop or improve any technique for medicine to use.
EDIT:
Luke Parrish mentioned one in the comments below.
For one, Hextend, a blood plasma volume expander used in conventional surgery, was developed by cryonicists at Trans Time, Inc while experimenting with hypothermia.
It's hard to understand cryonics in any meaningful way if you don't have wide swaths of regular science. Osmosis, ice formation, glass formation, toxicity mechanisms, chilling injury, apoptosis, blood pressure, ischemia, perfusion impairment... I will be wikifying this in the near future.
Can you provide more information, please?
The product you mention seems to have been developed by BioTime, a biomedical company.
The only relationship between BioTime and Trans Time (a now defunct for-profit cryonics company) that I've been able to find on Google was that Trans Time owned some stocks of BioTime:
http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=6399
This is what I'm going on:
http://www.evidencebasedcryonics.org/2008/10/12/biotimes-quest-to-defeat-aging/
Thanks
You have clearly never read the Alcor case reports. Whether you view them with horror-at-the-ineptitude, or awe-at-the-learning-process, they're clearly having all sorts of fun experimenting with the bodies.
Of course, whether this is useful research is up to you to decide, but it's clear that the "preservation" side is still rather experimental. They do at least document all of it, too.