michaelcurzi comments on Why truth? And... - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 27 November 2006 01:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: michaelcurzi 02 January 2011 01:03:08PM 1 point [-]

"For this reason, I would also label as "morality" the belief that truthseeking is pragmatically important to society, and therefore is incumbent as a duty upon all."

Morality doesn't need to have anything to do with society or duty. Consider the case of an rational ethical egoist, to whom acting in one's self-interest and for one's own values is virtuous.

Comment author: thomblake 12 May 2011 10:26:42PM 0 points [-]

Morality doesn't need to have anything to do with society or duty. Consider the case of an rational ethical egoist, to whom acting in one's self-interest and for one's own values is virtuous.

If that person is a human, and thinks that ethical egoism does not have anything to do with society or duty, then they are mistaken.

Comment author: michaelcurzi 13 May 2011 05:34:50PM 0 points [-]

Why?

Comment author: CuSithBell 13 May 2011 05:37:21PM 1 point [-]

I'd guess because humans often contain concepts of duty and the like, and have experiences vastly contingent on social / societal contexts.

Comment author: thomblake 13 May 2011 09:06:34PM 2 points [-]

Maintaining interpersonal relationships is vital to the human condition. As Aristotle put it, "The solitary life is perhaps suitable for a god or a beast, but not for a man". Friendships are a necessary part of flourishing for humans, and aside from that we are almost always in a context where our success depends upon our interactions with others.