Vladimir_Nesov comments on Why Bayes? A Wise Ruling - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Vaniver 25 February 2013 03:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 25 February 2013 05:21:28PM *  3 points [-]

Sorry, I have bad memory for details of this sort, only remember the abstract observation, which is recurrent enough that I have a cached phrase to identify and point out such situations ("This doesn't distinguish the alternatives!"). Could make up some examples, but I don't think it's useful for clarification in this case, and it won't provide further evidence for the existence of the issue.

Comment author: Kawoomba 25 February 2013 05:41:58PM 9 points [-]

Since the elements of the empty set satisfy arbitrary properties, all the examples you provided are technically evidence in favor for your observation. Also, against it.

Comment author: DaFranker 26 February 2013 03:57:56PM 1 point [-]

Heh <3

It's hard to find this kind of humor anywhere else than LW and XKCD.

Comment author: shminux 27 February 2013 12:58:51AM 1 point [-]

Actually, SMBC comics tends to be better than either.

Comment author: Manfred 27 February 2013 01:38:18AM 1 point [-]

We have some XKCD fans here, I see.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 February 2013 12:57:24PM 0 points [-]

Well, I think it used to be way better than it is now.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 25 February 2013 07:24:08PM 2 points [-]

If the woman who lost hadn't been so comprehensively messed up in the head, you would've had an example in the OP. I wonder if there was a similar test more likely to succeed.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 27 February 2013 08:00:34AM -1 points [-]

I have a theory that everyone does this, and it's a way for our brains to save space somehow. Just keep track of the rate at which things tend to occur instead of recording and cataloging every experience.