hen comments on Why Bayes? A Wise Ruling - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Vaniver 25 February 2013 03:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2013 05:30:34PM *  1 point [-]

People often use 'sentient' to mean 'sapient', and it may be that Eliezer intends the latter. It's at least pretty plausible that animals and very young infants are not sapient, namely not capable of judgement, and that this capacity is what would endow one with a certain autonomy.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2013 05:36:11PM *  -1 points [-]

"Soul", gotcha. Binary personhood marker. Reified concept not sufficiently unpacked. Okie.

Comment author: shminux 06 March 2013 05:43:07PM 0 points [-]

That's a rather uncharitable misinterpretation of what hen wrote, caused by anger and frustration, I'm guessing.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2013 06:56:53PM 1 point [-]

No, just the expressed befuddlement.

Comment author: Eliut 06 March 2013 07:36:29PM -1 points [-]

I respectfully disagree, sapience is an acquired subjective quality, therefore it is trivial to disregard. Now sentience is orders of magnitude more complex. I was going to say “inherent” to the species, but is it? Now this is supposed to be “the easy problem” go figure that.