= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_A_Somers comments on Exponent of Desire - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (13)
I think it fits better if cos = you have it and don't care that you have it, etc. I don't mean it fits what you were saying originally, but in terms of conceptual schema, I think the integral of w(s) is cleaner.
Sorry, you are right, I got confused.
In the OP, 0th order was your wanting the thing, right? So you were right that I gave him cos...
No, "you want it" corresponds to w, "don't want to want to want it," is -w^3/3!, etc.