= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Qiaochu_Yuan comments on The more privileged lover - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (108)
You ask several questions of the form "why is X true?" without first addressing the more basic question "is X true?" I dispute your framing of the situation and agree with the other commenters (commentators?), especially TimS.
Even if you want to vigorously defend the point of view that David has a right to sexual satisfaction, it does not follow that David has a right to sexual satisfaction with Jane.
Provided they are mono (which given everything else in the post seems extremely likely), so long as they don't break up David doesn't have a right to sexual satisfaction with either Jane (because of her religion) or anyone else (because they're in a mono relationship).
He has the right to leave the relationship with Jane.