TimS comments on The more privileged lover - Less Wrong

-16 [deleted] 04 March 2013 04:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (108)

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TimS 05 March 2013 04:21:15PM *  1 point [-]

For example, why does this apply to sex but not other forms of toughing?

Taboo "toughing." I don't know what you are referencing.

EDIT: If the replies below are correct that this is a typo for "touching," then the answer to your question is that non-consensual touching is also not allowed. But it's not as big a deal because the misconduct is less harmful.

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 March 2013 05:57:45PM 5 points [-]

I think it's a typo for "touching".

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 05 March 2013 05:59:09PM 2 points [-]

I read it as a typo and that they meant to say "touching"

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 06 March 2013 03:21:26AM 1 point [-]

If the replies below are correct that this is a typo for "touching," then the answer to your question is that non-consensual touching is also not allowed. But it's not as big a deal because the misconduct is less harmful.

Yes it was a typo. As for your question, see my reply here.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2013 01:14:12PM 1 point [-]

Ah, that makes sense.

(I had guessed it generically meant “interactions you'd rather not participate in”, and was going to answer: “Does it really just apply to sex? I want to sell you my empty water bottle for $2000. You don't want to buy my empty water bottle for $2000 (and if I'm wrong about this, please PM me). Guess whose desire is going to stay unsatisfied, and why.”)

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit