= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
OrphanWilde comments on LINK: Infinity, probability and disagreement - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (51)
There's only inconsistency when you mix in the axiom of choice, which is implicitly done here.
Not true. If the ZF is consistent, ZFC is also. If ZFC isn't, neither is ZF.
I was suggesting the outcome was inconsistent, in a non-mathematical sense of the term. It would perhaps better be described as a paradox of ZFC theory.
There are only countably many people. The well-ordering of the integers is accepted in ZF. You only need the axiom of choice if you want to well-order a larger set.