Mqrius comments on Co-Working Collaboration to Combat Akrasia - Less Wrong

54 Post author: ShannonFriedman 09 March 2013 06:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Mqrius 07 March 2013 03:36:38PM *  4 points [-]

It's an interesting idea, for sure.

For me, though, I really need the coordination part. A global study room where you can come and go wouldn't work as well for me: it lacks the precommitment I get from agreeing with an individual to work alongside eachother at a specific time and date. I can make the agreement in far mode, and then near mode sticks to it, only if I made the agreement with someone else than myself.

Another thing that popped into my mind when reading this is that you're trying to create a large joint effort, where everyone involved tends to procrastinate. That might be difficult.

I could imagine a different form of group arising if two individuals start out together, and then add a third at the same time and date, and if that works, keep adding people slowly. This would only work on skype if one person has a paid account, but I guess google hangouts could work.

Edit: An ongoing non-work-intended rationalist hangout would be quite interesting. It might have the same time-sapping risk as #lesswrong on IRC though.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 07 March 2013 05:49:00PM 2 points [-]

Yes, there are different failure modes. One of them is "never starting". Another is "starting... and then abandoning the original goal and doing something else (e.g. browsing a web)". My idea could work for the second one, but not for the first one.