Elithrion comments on Co-Working Collaboration to Combat Akrasia - Less Wrong

54 Post author: ShannonFriedman 09 March 2013 06:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Elithrion 09 March 2013 09:06:51PM *  5 points [-]

In practice, it's not going to need 85 people (and it's not going to work for everyone unscheduled), though, because the assumptions are implausible. According to the last survey, ~60% of users are in the US or Canada (and probably another 5% in South America?), and then >22% are in Europe. I would also guess that most people will probably also want to work in the evenings (say an 8h span between 6pm and 2am). This will probably concentrate the desired times a lot, so the popular times can be 80% populated with only something like 45 people (this is me guessing). Conversely, the unpopular times are going to be really dead.

On that note, it would probably make sense to create some sort of schedule. E.g. "We encourage you to come between 4pm and 8am PST." Or to coordinate smaller specific time slots (e.g. "come at 2pm PST for one hour") with a higher chance of having them filled.

Comment author: ShannonFriedman 12 March 2013 12:12:31AM *  0 points [-]

I've been very pleasantly surprised to see that the room has had people in it 24/7 since I first checked on it afternoon yesterday (current time for me is 5pm)! Usually about 5-6, I think the lowest I've seen is 3, although someone reported that in the quiet hours it got down to 2.

We'll see if we're able to keep it up, promising so far!

Comment author: Error 12 March 2013 02:29:10AM 1 point [-]

I like this idea, thought about checking it out, realized I don't really know how to expect and that it might not be optimal for my personality type...then slapped myself for obvious dithering.

I'll commit to dropping in tomorrow when I get home from work (~5:30EST) for at least an hour, to see if this suits me. After that, we'll see.

Comment author: Error 12 March 2013 11:44:10PM 2 points [-]

Results report: I did get some done. More than I can usually do on demand, though it's hard to say whether the benefit came from the technique or just from the novelty. Either way, I'll continue doing it until it stops working, at least four times a week, in the ~6:00-7:00EST time slot.

Comment author: AustinParish 10 March 2013 07:08:44AM 2 points [-]

If you constrain it to an 8 hour spread, it does indeed help things - you'd only need around 34 people agreeing to commit to 1 hour, so even more optimistic than your guess. And if we do get people to coordinate smaller specific time slots, perhaps convincing 25% to take a 1.5 hour slot and the rest to commit a minimum of 1 hour, this moves things closer to only needing a group of 30. Not too bad.