pnrjulius comments on Just Lose Hope Already - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 25 February 2007 12:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (76)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 13 January 2012 04:50:11AM 17 points [-]

Casey seems perfectly rational to me.

If you're in the hole 2.2.mil, what is the harm to you of doubling down? You'll have to declare bankruptcy twice as loudly?

This point was actually driven home to me over 20 years ago when I interviewed for trading position. If your company is way in the hole, it may as well take what assets it has and make a leveraged bet. Either it gets out of the hole, or it's twice as broke, which given limited liability, really isn't any more of a problem for the corporate officers.

Comment author: pnrjulius 30 June 2012 03:55:24AM 0 points [-]

Makes sense from the corporation's perspective. But also kinda sounds like moral hazard to me.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 30 June 2012 07:52:48AM *  7 points [-]

Of course. That was the point. If you can make more bets than you can cover, and suffer no liability when you can't, you've got yourself a license to steal. And clearly the trader knew it.