Stuart_Armstrong comments on AI prediction case study 2: Dreyfus's Artificial Alchemy - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 12 March 2013 11:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 13 March 2013 12:24:09PM 2 points [-]

He's overconfident, as are most experts - "computers will never" is a stupid prediction. But his reasons why the computer chess-playing machines of the 60s wouldn't work were correct. The problem in 1965 was that people were underestimating the difficulty of what went on in the human brain.