Stuart_Armstrong comments on AI prediction case study 3: Searle's Chinese room - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 13 March 2013 12:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 10 April 2015 11:25:20AM 0 points [-]

So why does it make sense to demand that the human (who, in the chinese room is really playing the same role as physics) understand Chinese in order to believe that the room-human system does?

It doesn't.

I think the argument obscures what might be a genuine point, which I look at here: http://lesswrong.com/lw/lxi/hedoniums_semantic_problem/