Luke_A_Somers comments on Risks of downloading alien AI via SETI search - Less Wrong

9 Post author: turchin 15 March 2013 10:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (98)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 15 March 2013 04:56:59PM *  4 points [-]

You receive a signal flashed in two color channels. Both off, I'll show as space, and for a lot of space, return. One on is 1, the other on is 2, and both on is 3. You receive:

  • 21 31221 1
  • 1 32 21 31221 21
  • 21 32 21 31221 221
  • 11 32 21 31221 2221
  • 221 32 21 31221 22221
  • 121 32 21 31221 222221
  • 211 32 21 31221 2222221
  • 111 32 21 31221 22222221
  • 2221 32 21 31221 222222221
  • 1111 32 21 31221 2222222222222221

  • 111 32 11 32 221

  • 2121121 32 121221 32 121211
  • 1 31 1 32 21
  • 121221 31 121211 32 2121121

  • 2

  • 2 3211 1
  • 2 3211 21
  • 2 3211 11
  • 2 3211 221
  • 2 3211 121
  • 2 3211 211
  • 2 3211 111
  • 2 3211 122212111211221
  • 2 3211 122112221212111
  • 1 3211 1 32 1
  • 11 3211 121 32 1111
  • 11 3211 21 31 1 32 111
  • 11 31 21 3211 1 32 121

  • 2 32221 21 32 1

  • 1 32221 21 32 21
  • 21 32221 21 32 221
  • 11 32221 21 32 2221
  • 21 32221 11 32 1221
  • 221 32221 21 32 22221
  • 221 32221 11 32 1222121
  • 21 32221 11 3211 21 32 21221
  • 21 3211 11 32221 21 32 2222221

  • 21 32221 111 3211 1211 31 1221 32

What do you reply?

Assuming you got that, there's more...

  • 312221 12221121 111 3312221121 32 111
  • 111 32 3312221121
  • 312221 12221121 121 3312221121 32 121
  • 111 32 3312221121 32 21

  • 322221 12221121 3332 3312221121 32 3312221121 3331

  • 322221 12221121 3332 2 3211 3312221121 3331
  • 322221 12221121 212211 3332 3332 3312221121 31 33212211 3331 32 3332 33212211 31 3312221121 3331 3331

  • 322221 12121 3332 21 32221 3312121 32 3332 21 32221 3332 3312121 32 1 3331 3331

Comment author: Antisuji 16 March 2013 06:59:54PM *  0 points [-]

Shouldn't these lines

  • 111 32 11 32 221
  • 2121121 32 121221 32 121211

be

  • 111 32 11 31 221
  • 2121121 32 121221 31 121211

? Or do I misunderstand? [Edit: I misunderstood :) — never mind.]

Also, the last line of the first part seems ambiguous, since gur beqre bs bcrengvbaf unf abg orra rfgnoyvfurq nf sne nf v pna frr.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 16 March 2013 07:19:09PM *  0 points [-]
  • 11 3211 21 31 1 32 111
  • 11 31 21 3211 1 32 121

  • 21 32221 11 3211 21 32 21221

  • 21 3211 11 32221 21 32 2222221
Comment author: Antisuji 16 March 2013 07:54:59PM 0 points [-]

21 32221 11 3211 21 32 22221

Do you mean

21 32221 11 3211 21 32 221221

?

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 16 March 2013 08:51:59PM *  0 points [-]

21 32221 11 3211 21 32 21221

I think that you, like I, just messed up the arithmetic there.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 16 March 2013 12:22:11AM *  0 points [-]

Can I ask for a minor correction on the line that says: "11 3211 101 32 1111" -- you've not defined what 0 means, so is it meant to be a space or a 2 instead? (probably the latter) Thanks.

ETA: I think the line above it may have a minor mistake too, "122212111211221" bhtug or gur bgure jnl nebhaq?

ETA2: I think a second problem with 33112221121 in the penultimate line -- one of the ones should be missing I think. If I'm wrong I've probably messed up my interpretation

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 16 March 2013 01:12:56AM *  0 points [-]

Your first and third corrections are right (and doh! Slippy fingers!)

The second stands. I've added another line there.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 16 March 2013 01:48:58AM 0 points [-]

Vs V'z evtug naq gung frpgvba vf nobhg cevzrf, gurfr ahzoref pna bayl or qrpvcurerq nf cevzrf vs gur beqrevat jnf ovt-raqvna (zbfg fvtavsvpnag qvtvg svefg), nf vg'f va uhzna hfntr bs Nenovp ahzrenyf -- ohg va gur erfg bs gur pbagrag lbh tvir, nyy gur bgure ahzoref zhfg or qrpvcurerq va yvggyr-raqvna beqre (yrnfg fvtavsvpnag qvtvg svefg)...

Thanks for the puzzle btw, it's great fun. I'll continue working on it tomorrow (it's getting late where I live). :-)

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 16 March 2013 02:37:05AM 0 points [-]

Added a few more lines. By including only the things I could do off the top of my head, I restricted myself to too-small numbers and gave you the wrong idea.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 15 March 2013 11:25:15PM 0 points [-]

Please don't give answer just yet, I've solved parts of it and I think I'm close to solving rest of it as well.

Comment author: Decius 16 March 2013 02:48:34AM -1 points [-]

That can be simplified to the level of illumination of Io and Ganymede as seen from Triton, accounting for all eclipses (probably not literally, but there are natural phenomena which produce patterns at least as interesting; see pulsars).

Since it's more likely that a natural phenomenon created this pattern of observations than that positional notation and time-ordering are shared by a given ETI, I would observe and try to understand the natural system which created this pattern.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 16 March 2013 02:13:47PM 0 points [-]

Doubtful.