Marshall comments on Test Your Rationality - Less Wrong

39 Post author: RobinHanson 01 March 2009 01:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (76)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment deleted 01 March 2009 02:16:19PM [-]
Comment author: steven0461 03 March 2009 08:44:00AM 6 points [-]

I don't know if karma is itself a good measure of rationality, but it might be a good subject to train calibration on. E.g., whenever you make a post or comment there could be an optional field where you put in your expectation and SD for what the post's or the comment's score will be one week later.

Comment author: Jack 03 March 2009 08:54:50AM 3 points [-]

Its too bad karma scores are reads-neutral. Late comments to posts tend to get ignored at the bottom of the thread. I wonder if one couldn't add a "Read this comment" button... though I imagine a lot of people wouldn't bother.

Comment author: Johnicholas 03 March 2009 09:59:05AM 2 points [-]

Late comments getting ignored would not be an issue if people primarily read comments via "Recent Comments".

Comment author: Jack 03 March 2009 11:02:45AM 2 points [-]

"Recent comments" may work when traffic is low and there is only 1-2 posts a day. But imagine when this thing gets going and you're posting in an old article during high traffic hours.

Comment author: khafra 02 June 2010 04:35:12PM 1 point [-]

Maybe there should be a "recent comments less than half the age of the article" feed.

Comment author: RobinZ 02 June 2010 04:42:45PM 3 points [-]

Maybe there should be "recent comments on this article" feeds.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 02 June 2010 11:23:24PM 1 point [-]

There certainly should be. And possibly a "recent comments on all articles except [list of articles]" feed. That way, people could see possibly interesting comments on old articles, while avoiding comments to recent high traffic articles they aren't interested in.

Comment deleted 01 March 2009 03:00:55PM [-]
Comment author: pwno 01 March 2009 10:34:49PM *  2 points [-]

Funny how the holiday became devoted towards making rational self-improvement goals. Which leads me to my next point: I think people who decide to self-improve on their own, and actually follow through, are already more rational than the average joe. Most people rationalize their mediocrity, find reasons not to self-improve, and stay preoccupied with tasks that don't impinge on their mental comfort level.

Comment author: badger 02 March 2009 12:03:44AM 4 points [-]

I agree that people that try to self-improve have more potential to be rational, but I don't think significantly more are in practice. If your goals are misplaced, achieving them could be worse than if you did nothing. On the subject of New Year Resolutions, my parents are apt to make goals like "attend religious services more frequently" and "read scripture more frequently", and they often succeed.

Comment author: Jack 03 March 2009 08:58:41AM 2 points [-]

You'd want people to estimate the utility of their goals and compare that to a post-goal completion estimate of utility. See here http://lesswrong.com/lw/h/test_your_rationality/dg#comments