= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Intrism comments on Reinforcement and Short-Term Rewards as Anti-Akratic - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (27)
The way the feeder is built, that wouldn't really help. It dispenses a constant volume, not a set number of candies. I could try to reduce the dispensed volume further, but I think other techniques would be best to try first.
It's not a problem except insofar as it interferes with some of the rules.
These are the two big options I'm considering for next time. I'm leaning towards the "1 candy per N points" model, because that allows me to "gamify" the system with a big XP bar.
You could try "adulterating" the candy with something non-edible, like colored beads. It would fix the volume concerns, be easily adjustable, and possibly add a bit of variable reinforcement.