SilasBarta comments on The cup-holder paradox - Less Wrong

18 Post author: PhilGoetz 26 March 2013 04:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SilasBarta 28 March 2013 06:39:45AM 2 points [-]

How many buyers do you think actually walk away from cars due to shoddy cupholders? I think the amount of complaining indicates that most people go on to buy cars and then complain.

Exactly what happened to me. Not with cupholders, but with "car shoddiness by a thousand cuts" that you don't realize until after you bought it, that isn't "bad" enough to justify returning but also is too bad to tolerate using the car. For example, a visor that can't fold out and to the side without significant collision with your head, and which also fails to protect most of the side window. Untraceable, hard-to-reproduce rattling sound. And a bunch of similar things I can't think of at the moment.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 30 March 2013 05:24:28AM 1 point [-]

So the car had bad aesthetics/taste in the sense Paul Graham uses the term here.