DanielLC comments on Buridan's ass and the psychological origins of objective probability - Less Wrong

1 Post author: common_law 30 March 2013 09:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 31 March 2013 03:53:21AM 2 points [-]

The Ass is not a digital computer. It's an analog computer. It's subject to continuity. That's important.

If you look at the Ass's center of mass five seconds after the experiment starts, and vary the relative sizes of the bales of hay continuously, the Ass's position must also change continuously. If you found some ratio of hey where the Ass ends up at the left bale of hay, but if you add any amount, no matter how tiny, it ends up at the right bale of hay, the Ass is violating the laws of physics.

It gets a bit more complicated because you can't add less than one particle to the bale of hay, but there are other things you can do, such as slowly move one piece of straw between the bales, or move the bales closer and further from the Ass.