CarlShulman comments on A Rational Altruist Punch in The Stomach - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Neotenic 01 April 2013 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 02 March 2014 05:45:51AM 1 point [-]

As I said in response to Gwern's comment, there is uncertainty over rates of expropriation/loss, and the expected value disproportionately comes from the possibility of low loss rates. That is why Robin talks about 1/1000, he's raising the possibility that the legal order will be such as to sustain great growth, and the laws of physics will allow unreasonably large populations or wealth.

Now, it is still a pretty questionable comparison, because there are plenty of other possibilities for mega-influence, like changing the probability that such compounding can take place (and isn't pre-empted by expropriation, nuclear war, etc).