timtyler comments on We Don't Have a Utility Function - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (123)
That's a complete straw man. I never claimed that you did. What I said was: "a utility function models its behaviour pretty well" - which is perfectly true.
Any computable agent. If it iisn't clear how to decompose a system into sensors and actuators, representation in terms of a utility function is not so useful - because it is not unique. It is convenient to use utility functions when you want to compare the values of different agents. If that's what you are doing, utility functions seem like a suitable tool.