DanielLC comments on What Rate of Return Should You Expect? - Less Wrong

11 Post author: jkaufman 07 April 2013 01:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DanielLC 07 April 2013 07:59:12PM 0 points [-]

There's an even bigger cherry-picking problem, however, in that they're all based on US returns.

That doesn't seem like it's that big. While there are about 196 countries, most of them are much smaller and less well-developed than the US, and the US was most likely chosen for this reason. It's not simply the luckiest country.

On the other hand, if the US had better returns based on something other than luck, you'd expect people would keep investing there until the returns drop.

Comment author: Randaly 07 April 2013 10:58:09PM 3 points [-]

The US is unusually large and developed precisely because it has had abnormally high growth (and also, therefore, high immigration).

Comment author: DanielLC 08 April 2013 02:08:47AM 0 points [-]

It's due to a combination of being old and having sustained abnormally high growth. If it's sustained, then it's not just luck. You can invest in the US and know that it will continue growing like it did before. It's not cherry-picking.

Comment author: gwern 08 April 2013 02:47:24AM 11 points [-]

If it's sustained, then it's not just luck.

Kinda the point of survivorship bias and other selection effects is that you can get what looked like 'sustained' performance just by luck...

Comment author: Decius 09 April 2013 07:12:48PM 1 point [-]

Said many people in every bubble ever.