= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Nornagest comments on New applied rationality workshops (April, May, and July) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (71)
That might show that CFAR's audience, or some of its members, wouldn't be gulled by a placebo self-help program, but it wouldn't show that CFAR's program is effective -- it might consist of more sophisticated platitudes, or teach skills that're only useful in unrealistically simple situations, or be impractical in other ways. If you want to know about effectiveness, you at some point need to compare outcomes.
A cheaper test might involve collecting outcome information from a sample of CFAR students and then finding similar samples from other programs and following up with them, but that would be susceptible to a bunch of demographic confounders.
Yes. You'd also need a fairly large sample size.
The issue isn't only that those who can't, teach. What if use of some math-inspired insights is actually very difficult? (Who'd offer 4 day classes in that then?) .