Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Pascal's Muggle: Infinitesimal Priors and Strong Evidence - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 May 2013 12:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (404)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 06 May 2013 06:07:31AM 0 points [-]

In real life, you are not ever supposed to have a prior improbability of 10^-100 for some fact distinguished enough to be written down, and yet encounter strong evidence, say 10^10 to 1, that the thing has actually happened.

Sure you do. As you pointed out, dice rolls. The sequence of rolls in a game of Risk

Those aren't "distinguished enough to be written down" before the game is played. I'll edit to make this slightly clearer hopefully.