DSimon comments on Pascal's Muggle: Infinitesimal Priors and Strong Evidence - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 May 2013 12:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (404)

Sort By: Best

Show:

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Schlega 07 May 2013 12:19:27AM * 2 points [-]

Edit: formatting fixed. Thanks, wedrifid.

My response to the mugger:

You claim to be able to simulate 3^^^^3 unique minds.
It takes log(3^^^^3) bits just to count that many things, so my absolute upper bound on the prior for an agent capable of doing this is 1/3^^^^3.
My brain is unable to process enough evidence to overcome this, so unless you can use your matrix powers to give me access to sufficient computing power to change my mind, get lost.

My response to the scientist:

Why yes, you do have sufficient evidence to overturn our current model of the universe, and if your model is sufficiently accurate, the computational capacity of the universe is vastly larger than we thought.
Let's try building a computer based on your model and see if it works.

Comment author: DSimon 07 May 2013 12:42:25AM 1 point [-]

You're trying to italicize those long statements? It's possible that you need to get rid of the spaces around the asterisks.

But you're probably better off just using quote boxes with ">" instead.