SilasBarta comments on Post ridiculous munchkin ideas! - Less Wrong

55 Post author: D_Malik 15 May 2013 10:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1240)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SilasBarta 16 May 2013 04:28:11AM 5 points [-]

I would be more surprised if, by only eating when you're socially required to, you happened to get the exact essential nutrients the diet would otherwise leave you without.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 19 May 2013 09:48:55PM *  2 points [-]

here's what i was thinking:

  1. "real food" has plenty of vitamins and stuff

  2. some of that stuff might have a long half-life in the body

  3. and be needed only in small (catalytic?) amounts.

so that

  1. you wouldn't know about them if you just studied basic nutrition textbooks (or perhaps nobody knows about them)

  2. if your social eating is frequent enough, you'd never lack them.

so, ideally, people following some soylent-type practice strictly will develop some interesting symptoms, and we'll discover some new stuff. but if they cheat, we don't learn as much.

i admit there's a good possibility that we already know about all the vitamin-like stuff there is. after soylenters start showing better 10-year mortality, i'll gladly join them.