Baughn comments on Post ridiculous munchkin ideas! - Less Wrong

55 Post author: D_Malik 15 May 2013 10:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1240)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Baughn 31 May 2013 01:40:25PM *  6 points [-]

Actually, I would suggest not focusing your attention on evolutionary anthropology while you're supposed to be piloting a multi-ton vehicle at high speeds.

Most people are far worse at driving than they believe themselves to be.

Now, assuming you're not in a car at the moment, you can probably hack something up using mplayer - there's at least one android port of that. You may need to write your own UI, though, and I suspect it'll reduce your battery life significantly. (Android native players take advantage of decoding hardware, mplayer probably doesn't. Also, the fourier transform required to speed up voice without affecting pitch is expensive.)

Comment author: matt 28 June 2013 04:51:26PM 3 points [-]

Actually, I would suggest not focusing your attention on evolutionary anthropology while you're supposed to be piloting a multi-ton vehicle at high speeds.

When you're driving a daily commute your mind is going to wander unless you have extraordinary focus control / mindfulness training. It's not obvious to me that it's more dangerous to have it directed to evolutionary anthropology than to what you're going to do when you get home (or wherever else it wandered).

Comment author: Baughn 29 June 2013 12:48:25AM 2 points [-]

There's a difference between accidental mental wanderings and deliberately focusing on a sped-up textbook.

If you're listening to a sped-up textbook without focusing on it, I'd say you won't get much out of the experience.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 June 2013 07:53:16AM 0 points [-]

Actually, I would suggest not focusing your attention on evolutionary anthropology while you're supposed to be piloting a multi-ton vehicle at high speeds.

(After reading that sentence, in particular the word “evolutionary”, before reading what you were replying to, I had briefly thought you were arguing against this and gone WTF.)