= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Larks comments on Compromise: Send Meta Discussions to the Unofficial LessWrong Subreddit - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (41)
Non-hypothetical meta test case: I have a book under review at a publisher. When it comes out, I'd like to post some of it here for criticism. Hooray for free content or boo hiss for commercial posting? Because yes indeed I hope LW readers are inspired to buy my book after I give part of it to them for free.
What is the subject of the book? Is it to do with the art of human rationality?
We're happy in general for commercial posting if relevant to rationality (CFAR, donation drives, job adverts) and unhappy with free content unconnected to rationality.