Juno_Watt comments on Privileging the Question - Less Wrong

102 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 29 April 2013 06:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (311)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Juno_Watt 01 May 2013 10:56:55PM *  0 points [-]

A stable government that loses power when it loses an election is, in fact "unstable".

Well, I suppose all govt. is unstable, then. Which dynasty has been in power forever?

Eh, taste-testers, bodyguards and damn good doctors are cheaper than election campaigns.

What good is that going to do a peasant like me? It's not like they are going to knock off the cost of electioneering from my taxes.

Comment author: MugaSofer 12 May 2013 09:55:04PM *  -1 points [-]

Well, I suppose all govt. is unstable, then. Which dynasty has been in power forever?

Stability is a matter of degree, as you're well aware. Few dynasties lose power after four years of rule.

What good is that going to do a peasant like me? It's not like they are going to knock off the cost of electioneering from my taxes.

Even a massive amount of spending on election campaigns is less likely to succeed (and thus less stable) than a (relatively) small amount of spending an safeguarding from assassination.

Also, election campaigns have negative effects on, among other things, the rationality of the populace; and they encourage polarization in the long term - in contrast, bodyguards discourage trying to off your rich uncle for the inheritance.