diegocaleiro comments on Using Evolution for Marriage or Sex - Less Wrong

17 Post author: diegocaleiro 06 May 2013 05:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: knb 06 May 2013 07:34:06PM -1 points [-]

Fair enough, although the overall point still stands. He is arguing in favor of promiscuity, something associated with lower happiness.

Comment author: diegocaleiro 07 May 2013 02:53:15AM *  1 point [-]

I felt like I was trying to help people get what they want, improving instrumental rationality. Long-terming frequently ends up in marriage, monogamous marriage even. More sex doesn't mean more partners (except when changing from 0 to 1, which is an important transition), and I don't understand why you think it does.

I personally think that being in a long-term relationship is a very good move for a human who wants to achieve higher levels of happiness. I have been in 4 over the last eight years, and will celebrate 3 years of the current one this Wednesday! :) I'm very glad about both of my longer relationships thus far (both 3 year long).

I most wanted to help Long-terming women and Long-terming men achieve their purposes, whom through the mild levels of autism, or high levels of influence of the PUA community, may have been mistakenly suffering about their prospects and endeavours.

I don't think that qualifies as promoting promiscuity. (note: I also do not object to promoting promiscuity)

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 07 May 2013 03:31:34AM 3 points [-]

I am trying to help people get what they want

Careful, this is a good way to get people addicted to superstimuli.

Comment author: diegocaleiro 07 May 2013 04:04:12AM 2 points [-]

Yeah, good point. I'm feeling addicted to reading and replying to this post now, which obviously is decreasing the signal to noise ratio of the post itself and my and other's early comments. For the sake of my future self, and my addictive self, I'll refrain from any further commentaries. (Please if you, reading this, downvoted the one comment which I said eluded me, still explain why, I'm baffled).

I'll catch up with my Masters now. This semester of experimenting writing on Lesswrong was great. Thanks to everyone who read this :)