= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
mare-of-night comments on Using Evolution for Marriage or Sex - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (148)
I don't know. There are less wrong and more wrong ways of doing it...
Humor aside, no, probably not, in and of itself. But I think the idea that sex is subject to rational consideration is itself valuable. So there is an implicit value there, outside what is actually written.
I upvoted the post for this reason. I've found myself searching for relationship-related stuff on LessWrong several times, and was never able to find much. (In particular, I'd really like to see some advice on maintaining relationships, and predicting which ones will succeed.)
This may help you: http://www.amazon.com/Endocrinology-Social-Relationships-Peter-Ellison/dp/0674063996