Eugine_Nier comments on Using Evolution for Marriage or Sex - Less Wrong

17 Post author: diegocaleiro 06 May 2013 05:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Multiheaded 08 May 2013 10:11:49AM 1 point [-]

If you're reply is that you get more pleasure this way, why not cut out the middleman and go directly to wire heading?

This is why the noncentral fallacy really deserves the title of the Worst Argument In The World. If [abortion], why not [murdering retarded people]? If [taxation], why not [slavery]?

(Also, "YOUR/YOU'RE"! What the hell's up with that, I don't understand how native English speakers can confuse those at all, never mind so frequently.)

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 09 May 2013 03:23:36AM 4 points [-]

This is not the noncentral fallacy. This is me pointing out that the hypothetical argument I'm responding to proves too much.

Basically the problem with arguments of the form doing X gives pleasure therefore we should do more X, is that the same argument applies to wireheading. If you have no better reply than wireheading seems ewe and X doesn't, keep in mind that your intuitions about what is ewe change depending on what you do.