asr comments on Using Evolution for Marriage or Sex - Less Wrong

17 Post author: diegocaleiro 06 May 2013 05:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 12 May 2013 08:49:31AM -2 points [-]

This experiment is totally irrelevant to the disagreement between Diego and myself. Diego is claiming that making yourself have more sex--including sex you would otherwise be reluctant to have--will make you happier. He says he knows this because of some conjecture based on an ev-psych just-so story. Your experiment tests whether forcing people not to have sex they already do want to have will make them less happy. Do you not understand the difference?

If having epsilon much less sex would make us less happy, then having epsilon much more sex would make us happier, unless we are at exactly the local optimum, which sounds unlikely a priori.

Comment author: asr 12 May 2013 12:58:40PM 5 points [-]

If having epsilon much less sex would make us less happy, then having epsilon much more sex would make us happier, unless we are at exactly the local optimum, which sounds unlikely a priori.

Human preference doesn't consider gains and losses symmetrically. We are dramatically more sensitive to losses than to gains.