whpearson comments on Meetup : Group Decision Making (the good, the bad, and the confusion of welfare economics) - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Davidmanheim 30 April 2013 04:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Davidmanheim 02 May 2013 10:52:58PM 1 point [-]

The problem with electing (human) agents is that you suddenly have principle-agent problems. Their priorities change if they gain status from being selected, whether it's because they want to be re-selected, or because their time in power is limited, or because it is unlimited. If they don't gain anything by being selected, you are likely to have no incentive for them to invest in making optimal decisions.

Even if this is untrue, you need to project their decisions, typically by assuming you know something about their utility; if this projection is mis-specified even a bit, the difference can be catastrophic; their utility also may not be stationary. So their are some issues there, but they are interesting ones.

Comment author: whpearson 04 May 2013 07:31:09PM 0 points [-]

Thanks! I suspected there was terminology for the principle-agent problem, but didn't know what to google.

Agreed upon it being a big issue. I suppose I am interested in whether we can ameliorate them, so that there are fewer of the issues, rather than eliminate them entirely.

I'll keep an eye out for any follow ups you do to this meetup.