Jayson_Virissimo comments on Rationality Quotes May 2013 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: katydee 03 May 2013 08:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (387)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 02 May 2013 01:06:05AM 16 points [-]

With numbers you can do anything you like. Suppose I have the sacred number 9 and I want to get a number 1314, date of the execution of Jaques de Molay - a date dear to anyone who, like me, professes devotion ot the Templar tradition of knighthood. What do I do? I multiply 9 by one hundred and forty-six, the fateful day of the destruction of Carthage. How did I arrive at this? I divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by two, three, et cetera, until I found a satisfying date. I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 6.28, the double of 3.14 and I would have got two hundred and nine. That is the year Attulus I, king of Pergamon, ascended the throne. You see?

Umberto Eco, Foucault's Pendulum (1989)

Comment author: Kindly 02 May 2013 02:20:15AM 9 points [-]

In statistics this is known as "overfitting".

Comment author: Thomas 04 May 2013 08:03:05AM 1 point [-]

I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 6.28, the double of 3.14 and I would have got two hundred and nine.

The Tau idea from Eco also?