Kaj_Sotala comments on Googling is the first step. Consider adding scholarly searches to your arsenal. - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Tenoke 07 May 2013 01:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 10 May 2013 07:14:38AM *  3 points [-]
  1. Look at the number of citations for an article. The higher the better. Less than 10 citations in most cases means that you can find a better paper.

A problem with this heuristic is that one may also cite a paper in order to debunk it, call it ridiculous, etc. Bem's psi paper has been cited 154 times, mostly by papers with titles such as "Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem’s (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice". So do also take a look at what those citing papers actually say.

Also, some papers may seem to have high citation counts, until you realize that it all comes from the author citing himself in later papers, or from random websites that Google Scholar counts as cites even though they are just pages put up by somebody who might be just as ignorant about the topic as you are.

Comment author: Tenoke 10 May 2013 11:39:14AM 3 points [-]

Yes, heuristics generally save you time in a lot of cases by sacrificing utility/accuracy in a small number of cases.