shminux comments on How to Build a Community - Less Wrong

13 Post author: peter_hurford 15 May 2013 05:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 15 May 2013 07:08:40PM 1 point [-]

Fair point, there are always constraints on what a dictator can do, some explicit, some implicit. I was using the broader description:

dictatorship (government without people's consent) is a contrast to democracy (government whose power comes from people)

Comment author: [deleted] 15 May 2013 07:48:16PM *  0 points [-]

Can you think of successful organizations that fit this description (description 3 from the wiki article)?

In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law, constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.

The trouble is, almost any organization within the jurisdiction of a state is going to be governed by some laws. But we should probably accept any candidate that is subject to no laws specific to its form of organization, which would probably include LW and moderated online communities generally. I can't think of any large organizations where very much is at stake in membership or organizational activities.

Comment author: Juno_Watt 15 May 2013 10:37:28PM *  1 point [-]

is everyone getting the point that you can't really say "Well, X works", when it only works because it embedded in some larger system that kind of makes it work (eg labour law constraining egotistical CEO's).

The problems of politics --actual politics -- are that it is inherently large scale,, and that it is where the buck stops.