TheOtherDave comments on The flawed Turing test: language, understanding, and partial p-zombies - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 17 May 2013 02:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (184)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 18 May 2013 09:16:23PM 0 points [-]

It doesn't even test whether someone's doing math at the time. I could be doing all kinds of math and, in consequence, fail the exam.

I would say, rather, that tests generally have implicit preconditions in order for interpretations of their results to be valid.

Standing on a scale is a test for my weight that presumes various things: that I'm not carrying heavy stuff, that I'm not being pulled away from the scale by a significant force, etc. If those presumptions are false and I interpret the scale readings normally, I'll misjudge my weight. (Similarly, if I instead interpret the scale as a test of my mass, I'm assuming a 1g gravitational field, etc.)

Taking a math test in a classroom makes assumptions about my cognitive state -- that I'm awake, trying to pass the exam, can understand the instructions, don't have a gerbil in my pants, and so forth.