= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
shminux comments on LINK: Google research chief: 'Emergent artificial intelligence? Hogwash!' - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (44)
I agree that human feedback does not ensure safety, what I meant is that if it is necessary for functioning, it restricts how smart or powerful an AI can become.
Necessary-at-stage-1 is not the same as necessary-at-stage-2. A lot of people seem to use the word "safety" in conjunction with a single medium-level obstacle to one slice out of the total risk pie.
Agreed. (Alternatively, this could end up like obedient AI maybe? Not sure).