CarlShulman comments on ...so did we now get cold fusion to work or what? - Less Wrong

-10 Post author: Friendly-HI 25 May 2013 01:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CarlShulman 25 May 2013 05:23:37PM *  15 points [-]

That scienceblogs review is completely devastating (Rossi prohibited all of the tests that would actually work, and just had people record the heat emitted from his plugged-in machine), and the guy has a long history of fake demonstrations and supposed roll-outs coming "very soon, really!"

His wikipedia page shows THREE successive fringe science companies promising miracle energy breakthroughs in completely separate areas of technology, contra accepted science: waste-to-oil, super-thermoelectricity, and now cold fusion. The previous companies failed to produce anything, and the first one brought criminal charges.

And you said:

Here's a news article wrapping up the main points:

But it's not a news site, it's the personal website of a cold fusion enthusiast (look at the sidebar or read the "about" section).

Also, there was a previous discussion post excited about cold fusion here with following discussion and rebuttal. You can read that to save time here.

Comment author: fortyeridania 26 May 2013 04:45:07PM *  3 points [-]

The OP said:

I'm way out of my depth here so I find it hard to judge

But look at this comment's four critiques:

  • The scienceblogs review is devastating

  • Rossi has a history of fakery, per his Wikipedia page

  • What is supposedly evidence for the claims is actually quite weak (it's not a news site, just a personal website)

  • This idea was discussed before and did not fare well.

The middle two are easily accessible even to those with zero relevant domain expertise.