CronoDAS comments on Research is polygamous! The importance of what you do needn't be proportional to your awesomeness - Less Wrong

22 Post author: diegocaleiro 26 May 2013 10:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CronoDAS 26 May 2013 11:33:56PM 24 points [-]

There's someone who once said that the most popular/prestigious research topics, such as theoretical physics, are oversaturated with really smart people; if one person didn't make a certain discovery, someone else would have done it soon afterward, so smart people should try to go into fields that are useful but don't normally attract geniuses. I don't remember where I read it, though.

Comment author: gwern 27 May 2013 12:02:44AM *  19 points [-]

You're thinking of Aubrey de Grey.

Comment author: CronoDAS 27 May 2013 03:18:38AM 3 points [-]

Thanks for tracking down the quote; I had trouble locating it.

Comment author: gwern 27 May 2013 08:56:54PM 4 points [-]

Well, that's what spaced repetition is for.

Comment author: CronoDAS 28 May 2013 06:10:40AM 1 point [-]

Normally Google works for finding quotes but my Google-fu failed me this time.

Comment author: westward 27 May 2013 03:53:13AM 9 points [-]

Which fields are not that competitive yet would yield useful results? What are optimal fields for bright people to enter?

Comment author: ChristianKl 28 May 2013 10:06:34PM *  3 points [-]

A good example would be the kind of work CFAR does to learn to teach people to be more rational. It's an important topic but there isn't that much competition for practical rationality training.

GiveWell would be another example from this community. It's an important project for which there weren't real competitors when it got started.

If you want to pick a topic for yourself, I find that spaced repetition learning is an area with a lot of potential where more work is needed. I don't think the Anki algorithms is optimal. If you are strong at math you could go and take the memosync data set and develop a better algorithm for estimating the timing of cards.

When it comes to teaching people how to create good spaced repetition cards the resources that are out there are pretty limited.

It's an area where you can do genuine work that helps the world without having to be an genius.

From my perspective there are tons of interesting projects that could use more work but are outside of prestigious academic interest.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 28 May 2013 07:39:40AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: CronoDAS 27 May 2013 04:06:52AM 3 points [-]

I don't know.