elharo comments on Changing Systems is Different than Running Controlled Experiments - Don’t Choose How to Run Your Country That Way! - Less Wrong

3 Post author: ShannonFriedman 11 June 2013 05:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (260)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 11 June 2013 11:10:39PM 2 points [-]

The article is currently at 52% positive, with one upvote showing. I think the smallest number of votes which could produce that exact result is 51 positive, 50 negative.

There has to be rounding, but (looking for vaguely plausible numbers), it has to be between 67 positive, 66 negative and possibly as low as 41 positive, 40 negative, depending on how the rounding is done.

Given my druthers, I'd like to see a graph showing the votes over time.

Comment author: elharo 12 June 2013 10:18:49AM 7 points [-]

A post that achieves a high number of votes in both directions strikes me as a very interesting post that should be called to attention. In other words, a post that is at +/- 1 because of 50 or so votes each way, is much more interesting than a post that is at +/-1 because of one or two votes.

I would recommend rather than showing just the sum, show the total of both +1's and -1's separately. It's strictly more information than just the sum.

Comment author: DSimon 13 June 2013 02:20:07PM 2 points [-]

Seconded. StackOverflow shows this information, and it's frequently interesting.

Comment author: ShannonFriedman 13 June 2013 09:04:50PM -1 points [-]

Would you mind pasting a link for this? I'd love to know exact numbers.

Comment author: DSimon 13 June 2013 09:20:35PM 1 point [-]

Sure. Here's the most-viewed question on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11227809/why-is-processing-a-sorted-array-faster-than-an-unsorted-array

If you click the score on the left, it splits into green and red, showing up and down votes respectively.

Interestingly, there are very few down-votes for such a popular question! But then again, it's an awfully interesting question, and in SO it costs you one karma point to downvote someone else.

Comment author: hylleddin 14 June 2013 11:47:55PM 0 points [-]

I agree. Reddit has a "controversial" sorting that favors posts with lots of up and down votes, and I prefer to use it for finding interesting discussions.